Skip to content

Optimize ingester userStats func #6722

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

Optimize ingester userStats func #6722

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

SungJin1212
Copy link
Member

This PR slightly optimizes the userStats function in the Ingester.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Checklist

  • [NA] Tests updated
  • [NA] Documentation added
  • [NA] CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

friedrichg
friedrichg approved these changes Apr 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@friedrichg friedrichg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Apr 28, 2025
danielblando
danielblando approved these changes Apr 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@danielblando danielblando left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@danielblando danielblando merged commit d681d56 into cortexproject:master Apr 28, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@danielblando danielblando danielblando approved these changes

@friedrichg friedrichg friedrichg approved these changes

@dsabsay dsabsay dsabsay approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
component/ingester lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size/XS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@SungJin1212 @danielblando @friedrichg @dsabsay